The Management Studies Anathema

Beech

CBT or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, to my way of thinking, is yet another manifestation of corporate mumbo-jumbo. It even sounds like something that might have emerged from Abraham Maslow just prior to his telling his disciples that Irony was a perversion that would have to be criminalized before any of us had a chance to achieve happiness by Self-Actualizing, otherwise known as working yourself into an early grave so that you can have more stuff than anyone else when you die jogging.

And yes I can be a horrible person, bound for eternal damnation who loathes the academics who chose management studies as a discipline but the fact is the Buddha makes infinitely more sense to humanity than Maslow's Psychology. Either way my fondness for the words retard and nit-wit is actualized mightily by Maslow, behaviorists in general and cognitive behaviorists in particular.  

What does Self-Actualization mean? If you cast your mind deep into the bowels of liberty as defined by post enlightenment thinking, go back to 1981, to expressions like Personal Growth, Self Esteem, you'll find a little ditty attached to visuals of girls and boys, some wearing glasses and looking very weedy, along with the lyrics: "Be all that you be, join the US Army."

Twenty years later, in 2001, The US Army wanted a change, something more in keeping with the servitude to a holism that produced Me, Me and Me to match the prevailing ethos of those sterile years. The new slogan was "Army of One." For fans of "Be all you can be," in 2023, that crap-ass, inconceivably absurd "Army of One" was disappeared and our self actualizing favorite "Be all that you can be" was returned to its rightful, possibly ironic, place in the recruiting office.

It must have been something they were eating in the 1950's, could have been sliced bread, that turned them bouncy. It was when this whole be all you can be, Chamber of Commerce in the now, gestalt therapy type vibe took on the glow of a personal responsibility with workshops, lecturers wearing tee shirts, revival meetings, homework and must read self help books. The point is I don't actually see authentic in a self-actualized individual. I don't see them as true to themselves and I'm not in the least impressed with the claim that these shin-guards who have climbed to the top of the actualization pyramid are less influenced by what others think. If anything they are more influenced.

No wonder Cognitive Behavioral Therapy took a death grip on the throat of Maslow's zoo keepers paradise of maladapted humanity. You can almost see the smile on the face of a Cognitive Therapist as he or she puts the principle tool of the Cognitive Therapy trade to work by identifying and then calmly and cooperatively reinterpreting a patient's cognitive distortions and reduces them to lightly carbonated decaffeinated fizzy drinks. "There's nothing under the bed sweetheart, a bacon and egg sandwich won't stop you from being all that you can be!" 

The Why and How

Shag-Bark Hickory

Baxter and Ivan have been quarreling about circus lion tamers and the role such a lion tamer might play in the process of drilling discipline into the ranks of the emotions. I'd wanted to talk about struggle as a lion tamer's dilemma. Too much and you got an angry, bitter lion. Too little and you got a big kitty cat that occasionally runs off with a toddler from the audience. Instead I'm going to use today as a chance to address Viktor Frankl's version of Will To as an access to the role of Myth in our Process of Becoming. Nietzsche had his Will to Power, Sigmund Freud had his Will to Pleasure and Viktor Frankl had his Will to Meaning.

'Nuff said really, but as a pompous old fart I'm obliged to go all dog's biscuit and a picture on these pages otherwise it wouldn't be a blog. Viktor Frankl was 92 when he died in 1997. Generally the word precocious was designed around chaps like Viktor, by the time he was 20 years old he'd done more than most people. He was writing to Sigmund Freud, criticizing the assumptions Freud had based his  psychoanalysis on, he was already on the verge of being expelled from the Alfred Adler's Individual Psychology Students Circle, he was getting himself ready to find fault with Jung's early ideas, and he was the Leader of the Social Democratic Party of Austria's Youth Movement. Social Democrats in Europe lean to the political left. In the 1930's Social Democrats and Communists were crushed by anti-democratic, authoritarian, corporatist, fascist inspired regime called the Christian Social Party similar to elements in the 2025 frightened white, slightly retarded people or nit-wit side of the current US Republican Party.

Alfred Adler, the organizing mind behind Individual Psychology died in 1937 at the age of 67. Adler Individual understanding of us people may have been grouped under the title Will to Belong. He was trained as a doctor became interested by how in the human body when one part of it went awry other parts developed to compensate. He decided that the same dynamic could be applied to an individual personality. For example a person who felt himself to be inferior to others, he or she would compensate for this sense of inferiority by producing behaviors the individual chose to believe would better adhere him to this or that social group. For Alfred Adler a Malignant Narcissist, or power hungry megalomaniac, would be described as a dangerous manifestation of an intense Inferiority Complex compensating through an  unchecked Striving for Personal Superiority.

Frankl's understandings of how Psychotherapy might be pursued, his Will to Meaning, are much informed by Nietzsche's off hand comment: "He who has a why to live for can endure almost any how." Frankl lost his mother, father, two siblings and his first wife to the Holocaust. Over a period of three years he survived four different Concentration Camps. In his understandings of us people he wasn't a reductionist, he didn't like the idea of dehumanizing us by interpreting us as the sum of our parts. We are complicated, ever changing and difficult, we struggle with meaninglessness, emptiness and aimless wandering. Frankl's Logotherapy which addresses our ability to know and his existential analysis which address our ability to make meaning, explored the individual in a slightly more creative and sensuous manner than other explorers of a Phenomena that's the why and how of Human Experience.

A Brief History of Liberal

Callery Pear

Liberal has never been that wedded to her bedfellows on the Symbolic Order. We're not talking about a gruff, bearded soldier of the Imperial Guard, marching stalwart and wrinkled with Napoleon's final assault at the Battle of Waterloo. This is the lady of dreams, she is as much perfect as she is flawed. Hate to say it but she came to the English Language from a Latin Classroom where the word liber still means free.

In the 1300's a man who was both generous and not bound to a trade or a master, was free. By the late 1700's John Locke and the Enlightenment had attached consent of the governed, individual rights, and free markets to the liberal neighborhood while La Belle France did their bit for Liberté, égalité, fraternité so that almost 200 years later Mireille Mathieu would curl the toes of all patriots with her rendering of La Marseillaise.

Then, just as Liberal was maturing and getting all cozy with her look and style of shoe, a bunch of colonial bovver boys on the western side of the Atlantic who were too delicate to risk the banner of socialism took the Orwellian Newspeak Pen to the word Liberal and turned it into the government intervention of the New Deal where liberal and progressives held hands, exchanged friendship rings, returned power to the working man and soon earned themselves the rebuke, libtard snowflake instead of socialist snowflake or communard.

Meanwhile back in the classroom even the Latin Teacher might point out the search for meaning is a different kind of free when you're hungry, homeless and missing work because you failed to recite the declensions of Mensa correctly. 

Populism

John Stuart Mill circa 1870

There's a strong argument for why failure to embrace a term like Ironic Paradox as anything other than a logical witticism that sounds clever and contains a pun is why the current set of Liberal Democratic Elites will never risk being populists, they'll never change anything, they are stuck in the mud structuralists and all of them are mirror images of mummy and daddy's good little career minded boys and girls, look at me rocking my first bow tie, I'm going to the Prom.

Prime amongst the arguments bemoaning the wimpytude of the Democratic Party here in the USA is the assertion that without a growing economy social stability is unviable and reelection to power impossible. This assertion has been surgically implanted into several populations and is usually accompanied by a wealth of addendums that portray Classical Liberal Economics as the sole source of a growing economy. These sets of assertions soon become emblazoned on a simplistic to the point of gormless banner: "They dribble and give work to plastic surgeons so don't F with the Rich."

One of the consequences of "Don't F with the Rich" is the increasing absence of conflict in the million-billion-and-squillionaire Classes which if Classical Liberal Economic theory is to hold true is the wellspring of the Free Market Principles Adam Smith dreamed of in his 'Theory of Moral Sentiments' which warped into that concept of the "Invisible Hand" which he raised briefly and then ignored in his better known contribution to Classic Liberalism, 'The Wealth of Nations.'

This tension between 'Theory of Moral Sentiments,' which is Adam Smith's pity the poor fools who don't play fair, and his 'The Wealth of Nations,' which along with Protestantism and the supply and demand curve became the English Speaking Capitalist bible, can only be settled by letting the Invisible Hand do its grizzly work of pruning the monied through returning conflict to free market capitalism. Theoretically, because they don't play fair and don't willingly cull themselves that should be done through state edict.

But as everyone knows, the state isn't a Classic Liberal Economic Hegemony, it's a Political Liberal Hegemony bought and paid for by the ignoble non-harakari class of dribble down along with their toadies, fantasy islands, high end riffraff.... it's a long hegemonic list of maggots and non-contributing furry growths who currently define human success.

In 2025 a Liberal Socialism would be a Capitalism for everyone, it might look like a dull marriage of Adam Smith's 1759 bride, his Theory of Moral Sentiments, to his 1776 Wealth of Nations, a betrothal that became a vision for John Stuart Mill, the political economist and civil servant who died in 1873. In those slower days, Mill, still fresh from his dissection of Hobbes and the Social Contract, suggested that Capitalist Societies would experience a process of socialization. Mill's version of how this would happen was very much wedded to a traditional workplace, of a factory floor happily engaged in efficiently producing goods and, possibly a few services. It was a rendering on parchment of an old-fashioned comfort, subtitled 'good, safe jobs in manufacturing' bolstered by a paternalistic ruling class guiding and educating workers into a promised land that had an empire. A familiar tone to anyone who might have read about the 20th Century.

Democratic Socialism, on the other hand, would mean active popular participation in the business decisions of land, labor and Capital.

The role of Passion in the dialectics of Politics has too often been considered curable when tamed by logical discourse that reduces Passion to science instead of bonded to barricades, pitchforks and storming castles. If you see passion as the motivation to struggle, and then question the mechanics of struggle, you'll find in struggle, however painful and inglorious it might be, a purifying quality that bends and sharpens Will.