We should look at Schopenhauer and the Vedic scholars of the Upanishads, with special reference to the meanings in the words Maya, Atman and Brahman. And when we have managed to do that we should look at Leela.
Maya is the illusion that objects are separate divided and isolated from each other, what Schopenhauer called indviduationis. Atman equals the deepest individual soul which when Schopenhauer stared into his, he saw Will. This Atman - Will - is identical to Brahman which for Schopenhauer and the Vedic scholars of the Upanishads is a universal reality, a single blind energy of the cosmos, that makes Maya, the idea that all objects are separate, a grand illusion in the human mind. And indeed when a person feels empathy, Vedic scholars would argue, that person is tearing away the veil of Maya.
Schopenhauer was a brilliant, miserable, unhappy hermit. His joy at reading at least some of the Upanishads, which he read in a Latin translation, gave him hope and a way to see himself in a Will as a blind, horrible monster that ate itself the only escape from which was to deny the flesh, isolate the self, close the curtains sit in a room and write. Otherwise life was a terrible tragedy of pointless striving and pain.
What Schopenhauer missed was the Vedic understanding of Leela, the divine, playful, sport of consciousness. Or as Tagore might have suggested to Einstein, that while everything was one, reality remained a shifting symphony of relationships in which a pluralism is the source of enthusiasm and joy, the landscape too vast for one script.
No comments:
Post a Comment