The enablers of Tyranny

Book

     An established pattern in our land places a premium on correct answers. A point comes when those correct answers become insecure. Let me just say that answers, a preoccupation that we people have chosen to call intellect, are written into history by politics not choice. And yes, there's a high chance you'll disagree on the definition of the symbol politics. And yes, there's a high chance you'll disagree on the statement; "The written world is an inadequate means of both communication and record keeping."

   "Aught is better than naught!" Or "owt better'n nowt." Then consider the expression or idiom: "Better aught than naught." 

    Granted aught and naught are archaic words. The first records suggest they go back to the 12 Century.  Allow yourself to understand that both words are still in use. Of the two statements, the second one, "better aught than naught," is recorded as the original and therefore correct version. This of course is nonsense in human speak but is sensible in number speak where "E=MC squared" is not "MC squared = E."

   The missing element between these two phrases, is not which one of them came first, it's the nuance, tone and the more visual signals that are entirely context related. Oh sure, Wittgenstein's language game has been well absorbed into the fabric of LLM training. If you want to know how, the machine records impressions of this or that human through the history of machine/human interactions. The context of a language exchange between machine and a particular person is build around past interactions and are added to the machines capacity to predict by searching through probabilities unique to the recorded interactions between machine and a particular human.

    The machine will have a record of your name, your age, your marital status and on it goes. A good chance the machine will have a record of you politics, your likes, your religion, what you find funny... From these records it will have a model of you from which it can predict likely interests, behaviors etc. It can do all these things as it quietly kicks the Turin Test in the nuts.

   The reason to give consideration to a machine's access to spoken language while converting written language into mathematically commodifiable number symbols has much to do with what, over the past five thousand years, the Written word has already done to our species.

    And what might that be?

    Written language is a consort of Agriculture, they are the original sins, together they have enabled the tyranny of commodity. Agriculture destroyed the natural world, written language began the process of destroying humanity. Spoken language, opposable thumbs and sublime sunsets are about all we have left of our humanity. 

       

It's fairly simple

Processionary Walnut Moth have hatched

    As a species we people struggle with singularity. Psychology, when in the pay of an autocracy, has puttered around probabilities and produced questionnaires that purport to match an individual to his or her calling. 

   And why is a questionnaire necessary? Because it's marketed as an efficient method of deciding where this or that human resource belongs. 

   The point about a type A personality, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is something like this : 'high ambition, intense competitiveness, time urgency, impatience, and a constant drive for achievement.' In short, for type A personality, singularity is getting other people to do what a type A personality wants them to do.

   In our world, many of these total a-holes are sieved out of the population then matched to employment opportunities in  corporations and other oligarchic structures that cut throats for their living, this includes theological structures and the political classes

    There's argument of course, but generally a personality emerges from a combination of innate genetic predispositions and the environment in which those predispositions are encouraged to dominate.

   When let loose on society, a type A personality will be subjected to levels of stress each time it senses the disappointment of not getting its way. Worth noting here that time moves and doesn't stand still so things like looking old, getting old and dying are unavoidable. 

   For a Type A, adapting to stress without being destroyed by it is a secret that doesn't come in a bottle, or from a kitchen or from a pharmacy or from a street corner or from a plastic surgeon or from giving itself to the Lord and finding peace in powerlessness.

   Where does the secret come from?

  It comes from becoming a bigger and bigger and more complex a-hole.

Europe and West Asia, Al in Arabic means House of.

The Kaaba. August 2018 - photo by Ali Wahid

    One of the main architects behind the current borders in Middle Eastern countries is a man called Sir Percy Zachariah Cox. He was a Major-General in the British Indian Army, he had a bunch of other titles, he was skinny and probably very bright, not big on rugby, more of a cricket and chess man and he died in 1937 a year before Oil was discovered in Saudi Arabia.

   In 1899 Percy was appointed Political Agent and Consul at Muscat and Oman, he later became Acting British Consul for this ancient part of the human world that had cleverly avoided being incorporated into the Ottoman Empire, but which had remained within the sphere of Ottoman influence for several hundreds of years. It was an area that included The Najd which is now part of Saudi Arabia.

    In 1899, when Percy Cox arrived in Muscat there was a major quarrel between the British, the French and the Arabs, a quarrel which amongst other things included the slave trade.

  The French had leased coastal land from the Sultan of Oman so they could maintain a coaling station for French merchantmen and the French Navy. The British had traditional problems with French merchantmen and the French Navy, they wanted the French out of the Indian Ocean, as far away from the Indian Subcontinent as possible, but mostly the British wanted to stop the slave traders from ruining British chances of controlling all of Eastern Africa.

   Unfortunately over the years Muscat and Oman had made good money trading slaves, ivory, rhino horns and so on. The French, in their territorial ambitions, had no real problems with a trade which had enabled the Sultans of Muscat to maintain a substantial empire that followed the Indian Ocean all the way down to the Cape of Good Hope. Instead the French had their eye on the Cradle of Civilization, up there were the Tigris and Euphrates made for rich and fertile lands.  And what with the Strait of Hormuz being something of tight fit, French territorial ambitions preferred friendly relations with Muscat and Oman.

   One of the problems north of Oman is and was called The Najd. It was a loose leaf collection of warring clans  and families who hadn't been able to get their minds around the idea that the world was divided between The British, The French, the Portuguese, the Germans, the Russians, the Ottomans, apparently the Omanis and eventually the United States.

   Sultans of Muscat had been obliged for centuries to keep an eye on the Najd, do everything they could to make quite sure The Najd was in a constant state of turmoil, because when those people up there weren't in a constant state of turmoil, they had this aggravating habit of trying to take the Sultan's palace and an income that included ship building and piracy away from him.

    A major player in the Najd were the Banu Hanifa clans. Long before Islam they had founded the city of Riyadh.  Around 1720 they'd formed a mutually advantageous alliance with the followers of a man called Abd al-Wahhab, he was a leader, an Imam, an activist, a scholar and a very strict medieval type religious cult leader. At times Banu Hanifa and their Wahhabi sect dominated Riyadh, when they did they presented a threat to Muscat and Omen. At other times they were busy with other things. They'd been beaten up by the Ottoman to keep them in their place, nor were they the only fierce and ambitious clan in the mostly empty lands of Arabia who laid claim to the walled city of Riyadh.

  Percy Cox with very little help from the French or the Sultan of Oman decided that it was time to make some sort of sense of The Najd by giving it what some might call a Land Law that was properly mapped out rather than constantly quarreled over depending on whim. It was a game the Ottoman's were good at playing. 

   Percy, had become Pro-Consul for the entire Middle East, a role he played from 1904 until 1919. He had much to learn about the area and its people. To help him, an archaeologist called Gertrude Bell who had traveled widely in Arabia had provided him with detailed lists of Arabian clans, territories and alliances she'd gathered though her own observations and from Colonel, then later Aircraftman, TE Laurence as well as a chap called Captain William H.I. Shakespear.

   Amongst his cadre of Political Officers Percy had a man called Jack Philby, his full name was Harry St. John Philby and he was the father of Kim Philby, a Cambridge man who spied for the Russians and died in Moscow in 1988. 

   Four years prior to the First World War Captain William H.I. Shakespear became the first British Political Agent to make contact with a Son of Saud called Abdulaziz II, who was leader of the Al Saud people. They'd recently been knocked around a little by one or other of their many enemies and the clan was feeling vengeful. Shakespear became military advisor to the Al Saud in the February of 1910. In 1915, in the first days of the Second of three Saud-Rashid wars, Shakespear was killed at the Battle of Jarrab. The British supported Al Saud and the Ottoman supported, traditional enemies of the House of Saud, the House of Rashid. 

    The Battle of Jarrab was fought in central Arabia, it was brutal and horrible, several Al Saud allies chose to run away, Al Rashid were the victors, the British lost an officer and went into a sulk with Abdulaziz who compared to Al Rashid had far too many enemies in the Najd.

    The Ottomans were gone, Britain and France were carving up the Middle East, the USA was sniffing around, this presented a very new set of problems for Arabia. For Abdulaziz, who in the end had had a good First World War, it was a little difficult to know what to do in this new, yet very familiar, set of circumstances. He wanted security and peace, and didn't want to have to make war or be told what to do by Britain or France.

    With Shakespear dead Abdulaziz adopted Jack Philby as an advisor to help with his European Problem.  Philby pointed out the boundary lines Cox, in his attempts to make Land Law across the Arabian Peninsular, had carefully put in place and had partially negotiated. Philby advised Abdulaziz to utilize the political and religious alliance his Al Saud had had with followers of Wahhabi since the 1740's. Get the fundamentalists to do the dirty work, get them to carve out and secure the traditional source of tribulation which was the Najd all the way to the Red Sea, south to the border with Omen and Muscat, might as well take a rational control of Mecca and promise access to one of the five pillars of the Islamic Faith to all who were physically, emotionally and financially able to perform the Hajj.

    After many battles, by the time oil was discovered in 1938, the Al Saud dominated the Najd and Abdulaziz II became the first king, or paramount chief of Saudi Arabia. The Wahhabi were like the Church of Rome to his Holy Roman Empire.

   Abdulaziz bin Abdul Rahman bin Faisal Al Saud, often called Ibn Saud, died in 1953. When he died one of the largest sources of oil in the world had been secured by the California Arabian Standard Oil Company. In 1944 CASOC was renamed the American Arabian Oil Company or ARAMCO

Free Markets and a well funded narrative?

Sunset

    Let's have a look at the new world with a few thoughts on 'Pricing Surveillance.' 

   What is pricing surveillance? 

   "It's when something like a supermarket uses personal data, browsing history, and AI algorithms to calculate your maximum 'willingness to pay' and then charges different people different prices for the exact same product or service."

   At the root of it is that moment or two when a carefree and happy gardener has to decide how much to charge a customer for something like weeding an ill-considered and tasteless perennial border that's not getting enough sun.

   Don't get me wrong unindentured day laborers have been floating this boat of pricing surveillance since the end of Guild System which eventually occurred in the last days of The Enlightenment during the dawn of an Industrial Revolution which presaged an era of denial the leisured have called The Romantic Age.

   What do the property owners look like, does the missus seem like a person who makes a good cup of tea, appreciates a chocolate biscuit and is happy with the mister. Does the mister work. Does he mow the lawn or does she. Does anybody in the household know how to weed or trim hedges. If you're invited inside do you feel obliged to take off your boots.... 

  There's a whole list which is built over time through the personal experience, often bitter, of being a jobbing gardener, and it's not just about guessing from the condition of their footwear what a property owner can afford to pay. It has much more to do with what psychologists call 'deservingness' because they can't bring themselves to call it 'tone.' 

    Once 'tone' is established, you might think the next issue is "How badly do I need this work?" You'd be wrong! The next question is "How much do they want me to do this work and how much do I want this work?"

    At the moment, when you give that calculation to an algorithm there are invisibles for which the algorithm has no data.